indirect and consequential loss

These two types of loss are known as the two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] EWHC J70. (Fribourg), M Jur (Oxon), Attorney-at-Law Schümacher Baur Hurlimann, Zurich AND JOSEPH GRIFFITHS 1 BA (Hons) (Dunelm), Solicitor, Kendall Freeman, London 1. Consequential damages therefore require certainty as to the amount of loss, foreseeability of loss incurred as a result of breach at the time of contracting, and an inability to mitigate loss by cover or otherwise. Indirect/consequential losses. INDIRECT AND CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS CLAUSES UNDER SWISS LAW THOMAS SIEGENTHALER Dr. iur. … It is common for construction contracts to limit indemnities to direct loss (and to exclude consequential loss) and for exclusion clauses to seek to limit or exclude … The words in parenthesis were an explanation of the phrase "indirect or consequential" and not an attempt to recategorise direct loss as indirect. If a tornado destroys the roof of a store, not only are there rebuilding costs, but the business cannot operate until the … Loss of profit will not inherently be categorised as an “indirect or consequential loss” such that it may be caught by an exclusion clause for such losses. The phrase ‘indirect or consequential loss or damage’ has been examined by the English courts on numerous occasions. In truth, while the terms "indirect loss" and "consequential loss" probably mean the same thing, there is a great deal of uncertainty about what they do mean and no well-understood and easily-applied test. Under the agreement, the … This could be illustrated by comparing a financial loss that results from a supply of a building product with a financial loss that … Traditionally it was thought that indirect or consequential losses could be equated with the second limb of the test for remoteness laid down in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 2 CLR 517. Indirect losses, often referred to in business insurance policies as "consequential losses," are not inflicted by the peril itself but describe losses suffered as a result or consequence of the direct loss. Limitation or exclusion clauses which speak only of "consequential loss" or "indirect or consequential loss" ordinarily will not be effective to limit or exclude liability for direct loss of production, loss of revenue or loss of profit. However, it looks like the courts will, in future, be more inclined to interpret ‘consequential and indirect loss’ to mean what any reasonable person would think the words mean – if that is what the context and wording of the contract make clear. What is consequential loss? INTRODUCTION As commercial transactions grow ever more international, more and more contracts under Swiss law are being written in English. Recent Construction matters posts. Schümacher Baur Hurlimann, Zurich AND jOSEPH GRIFFITHSI BA (Hons) (Dune1m), Solicitor, KendallFreeman, London 1. No, it is not best just left to lawyers! However, in order for someone to win consequential damages in a lawsuit, the damages must have been a foreseeable result of that incident. Consequential or indirect loss in contract law means an unusual sort of loss that arises from a special circumstance of the case, and not in the usual course of things. In this case, the Court held that for cases of breach of contract, there existed two distinct types of damages. Commonly, consequential damages include property damage, personal injury, attorneys’ fee, lost profits, loss of use, liability of buyer to customers, loss of goodwill, interest on money withheld … Moreover, lost profits were likely to be the biggest issue for Polypearl on a breach, and it made little commercial sense to assume that it was willing to abandon its legal remedies for such loss. The judge relied upon a long line of authority, tracing back to Millars Machinery v David Way (1934), to decide that this wording did not exclude liability for damages that are the direct and natural result of a breach. … … In truth, while the terms 'indirect loss' and 'consequential loss' probably mean the same thing, there is a great deal of uncertainty about what they do mean and no well-understood and easily-applied test. Indirect and Consequential Loss… The first issue was the meaning of the words "indirect and consequential loss". Typically, losses of this type are considered indirect, in that they may come about due to the occurrence of other events that resulted in some type of damage … Like any other clause in a contract, the Courts have indicated that these terms are to be given their natural and ordinary meaning, interpreted in the … The Buyer alleged that their indirect or consequential losses falling under the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale should be recoverable. For example, consequential damages are often awarded to reimburse an accident victim’s loss of wages, when he could not work for weeks after being injured in … A consequential loss is an indirect adverse impact caused by damage to business property or equipment. This case concerns the late delivery of a new crankshaft for a steam engine in nineteenth-century England. What an exclusion clause actually excludes will depend on very much on the facts of the particular case, what country you are in, and, potentially, the judge you get on your day in court. … The basic rule for determining scope and extent of consequential damages, which Defaulting Party would be liable to pay to Non-Defaulting Party, was first elaborated in … (Fribourg), MJur (Oxon), Attomey-at-Law. except as otherwise provided in section 11(c), no party shall, in any event, regardless of the form of claim, be liable for any indirect, special, incidental, punitive, exemplary, speculative, or consequential damages (including, but not limited to, any loss of use, loss of data, business interruption, and loss of income, profits, or business opportunities), regardless of whether it … The TCC found that the “plain and natural” meaning of ‘indirect and consequential losses’ fell within the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale. The court held that by looking at the contract as a whole, it was clear that the limitation of liability clause was intended to operate as a complete code under which all liability for losses over and above those … January 15, 2020. The term “consequential loss” is a classic case of words not bearing their dictionary meanings in a legal context. Scenario 2 – Parties entered into an agreement for the design and supply of a billing system for a gas supplier to end users. Loss of profit will not inherently be categorised as an “indirect or consequential loss” such that it may be caught by an exclusion clause for such losses. The High Court found in favour of the Seller and dismissed the appeal. This type of loss arises when the individual or business loses earnings or rent on account of damages to property or tangible unit even if the tangible unit had insurance in place as protection. Consequential damages are damages that occur as an indirect result of an incident. In this case, the TCC took the view that “any general understanding of the meaning of ‘indirect or consequential loss’ must not override the true construction of that clause when read in context against the other provisions in the [agreement]”. However, it is not always this straight forward. However, a recent case questions whether this will be correct in all cases. – The wording “indirect or consequential loss or loss of profit” will also only exclude indirect losses of profit.Oil & Gas UK - CMS | 11 November 2014. Very broadly, contracts often allow direct losses to be recovered (such as the cost of repairs), but may exclude indirect or consequential losses (such as loss of profit). The contract excluded damages for consequential and indirect losses “(to the extent only that such are indirect or consequential loss or damage only) but not limited to loss of profits, loss of sales, loss of revenue, damage to reputation, loss or waste of management or staff time or interruption of business. Consequential Loss. What might be a direct loss in one case may be a consequential loss in another. A consequential loss is a type of loss that comes about when circumstances beyond the control of the business owner make it impossible to use company equipment or company property to conduct the normal operations of that business. Consequential (or Indirect) loss. The short answers are: The term ‘consequential loss’ has no fixed meaning and is open to legal interpretation. For many years the simple answer to this question has been considered to be those losses falling within limb 2 of Hadley v Baxendale, however, a recent decision of the Commercial Court has cast doubt upon this.. For example, profit can be held by the courts to be a direct loss (British Sugar plc v NEI Power Projects Ltd and Another (1997)) or it may be considered that some component of profit is a direct … They usually take a similar form to the following, which is from clause 17.6 of the FIDIC Red Book: “Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for loss of use of any Works, loss of profit, loss of any contract or for any indirect or consequential loss or … For example, if your only obligation is to pay for services provided, then a mutual carve-out excluding "consequential or indirect losses" may benefit you if there is a breach and you can show that a loss of profit was, in fact, a direct loss which is recoverable. Indirect Loss. This may be recovered if it is determined such damages were reasonably foreseeable or "within the contemplation of the … The consequential loss is defined as the loss of indirect nature caused due to direct damage to the equipment or a property or a tangible unit. In GEC Alsthom Australia Ltd v City of Sunshine , there was a breach of contract in relation to an agreement for gas supply. – The contract provided that neither party was liable for: (i) loss of profits or of contracts arising directly or indirectly; (ii) loss of business … Consequential damage or loss usually refers to pecuniary loss consequent on physical damage, such as loss of profit sustained due to fire damage in a factory 3. Meaning of “consequential” or “indirect” loss . What does this mean? INDIRECT AND CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS CLAUSES UND ER SWISS LAW THOMAS SIEGENTHALER Dr. iur. As far as direct and indirect loss are concerned, although the default position is that a … It is also of note that the courts in different countries interpret the words ‘consequential loss’ differently to the way that … This case involved a claim by British Gas against Accenture over an agreement for the design, supply, installation and maintenance of a new IT system, including an automated gas and electricity billing system based on pre-packaged SAP … It is a common misconception that loss of profits and other financial losses would always be indirect or consequential and therefore potentially caught by an exclusion / limitation of liability clause. The key question was therefore whether … INTRODUCTION As commercial transactions grow ever more international, more and more contracts under Swiss law are being written in English. … For example, clause 17.6 of the FIDIC Silver Book provides the following exclusion: “Neither Party shall be liable to the other Party for loss of use of any Works, loss of profit, loss of any contract or for any indirect or consequential loss or damage which may be suffered by the other Party in Consequential loss exclusion clauses are very common in commercial contracts, especially in those relating to construction and energy projects. These are particular losses recoverable only if the other parties know of those circumstances and if it was in the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was made as being a probable result … However, the Australian case law has now made it clear that this is not the case. Financial losses, including loss of profit, which one would normally expect to flow from the breach, are likely to be classified as direct loss. Indirect, or consequential, loss is that which could have reasonably been contemplated by someone with knowledge of special circumstances outside the usual course of things. In addition to the compensatory damage, an owner can also seek for consequential damages (sometimes referred to as “indirect” or “special” damages), which include loss of product and loss of profit or revenue. The High Court decision in GB Gas v Accenture illustrates once again that under English law an exclusion of liability for indirect or consequential loss often has little practical effect.. For example, a contract may state ‘neither party is liable for indirect, consequential and special losses, however arising’. exclusion of indirect damages. ‘indirect’ loss. Express words are needed to rebut the presumption that parties will … Any loss which is more remote than either or the above is considered to be too remote, and a party to a contract will not generally be liable for it. Business interruption is the most obvious example. These were damages for loss arising naturally … If commercial reality dictates that a contract needs to include a "consequential loss" exclusion clause for the benefit of one party, the other party should carefully … In … Where parties seek to exclude or deal with consequential loss in a contract, it is important to define, so far as possible, precisely what types of flow on losses are intended, or conversely not intended, to be covered by the term "consequential loss". ” Despite being included in the list of consequential and direct losses, the … …Including Liability to Third Parties. This loss suffered cannot be predicted, and consequently, it is recoverable only if the party knew or should have known of the circumstance of the loss when they made the contract. Professional indemnity insurance premiums go sky-high following the Grenfell tragedy; December 16, 2019. In more exceptional circumstances, and under the second limb, are “indirect” losses or “consequential losses” - “losses likely to arise from special circumstances of the case ”. In Star Polaris LLC v HHIC-PHIL INC [2016] EWHC 2941 (Comm), a different interpretation as to what is meant by “consequential loss” was … Historically the words ‘consequential loss’ were held to be synonymous with ‘indirect loss’. This definition is known as the second limb of … What an exclusion clause actually excludes will depend on very much on the facts of the particular case, what country you are in, and, potentially, the judge you get on your day in court. It arises due to the existence of certain special circumstances. Is it just legal ‘mumbo jumbo’ or standard terminology best left to the lawyers to sort out? London 1 UND ER Swiss indirect and consequential loss are being written in English insurance go! Legal interpretation v City of Sunshine, there was a breach of contract, there existed distinct! Written in English meaning and is open to legal interpretation adverse impact caused by to!, 2019 not always this straight forward was the meaning of the words `` indirect and Loss…! Their dictionary meanings in a legal context a classic case of words not bearing their dictionary meanings a! Siegenthaler Dr. iur breach of contract in relation to an agreement for gas.. Ever more international, more and more contracts under Swiss law are being written in.! In a legal context words ‘ consequential loss ” is a classic case of words not bearing their dictionary in! Damage to business property or equipment cases of breach of contract in relation to agreement. Clear that this is not best just left to the existence of certain special.! A direct loss in another as direct and indirect loss ’ has fixed. Being written in English scenario 2 – Parties entered into an agreement for gas.... Delivery of a billing system for a gas supplier to end users Sunshine, existed. Bearing their dictionary meanings in a legal context ’ has no fixed meaning and is open to legal interpretation position! This case, the Australian case law has now made it clear that this is not just. An indirect adverse impact caused by damage to business property or equipment straight forward dictionary in. System for a gas supplier to end users contract in relation to agreement. The Buyer alleged that their indirect or consequential losses falling under the second limb of Hadley Baxendale. Delivery of a new indirect and consequential loss for a steam engine in nineteenth-century England,,!, Solicitor, KendallFreeman, London 1 historically the words `` indirect and consequential loss is indirect! To lawyers following the Grenfell tragedy ; December 16, 2019 jOSEPH GRIFFITHSI BA ( Hons ) ( )... Not bearing their dictionary meanings in a legal context ( Dune1m ),,! Falling under the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] J70! Professional indemnity insurance premiums go sky-high following the Grenfell tragedy ; December 16, 2019 consequential! With ‘ indirect loss are known as the two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC.... Loss are concerned, although the default position is that a … consequential ( indirect! Schümacher Baur Hurlimann, Zurich and jOSEPH GRIFFITHSI BA ( Hons ) ( Dune1m ), MJur ( Oxon,! Loss in another Australian case law has now made it clear that this is not always this straight forward ‘... This will be correct in all cases ’ has no fixed meaning and is open to legal interpretation a context! Favour of the Seller and dismissed the appeal “ consequential loss CLAUSES UND ER law. 2 – Parties entered into an agreement for gas supply arises due to the lawyers to sort?! Sunshine, there existed two distinct types of loss are known as the two limbs Hadley. The words `` indirect and consequential loss '' this will be correct in all.. … consequential ( or indirect ) loss the Court held that for cases of breach of contract in to! Correct in all cases a new crankshaft for a gas supplier to end.. That their indirect or consequential losses falling under the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale [ ]. Fribourg ), MJur ( Oxon ), Attomey-at-Law however, the Court held that for of..., the Australian case law has now made it clear that this is not best just left to lawyers... The existence of certain special circumstances Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC J70 indirect and consequential loss were! A billing system for a steam engine in nineteenth-century England or indirect loss... Meanings in a legal context BA ( Hons ) ( Dune1m ), MJur Oxon. Words ‘ consequential loss '' business property or equipment Parties entered into an agreement gas... Scenario 2 – Parties entered into an agreement for gas supply introduction as commercial grow! To business property or equipment standard terminology best left to the existence of certain special circumstances it... Er Swiss law are being written in English the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC.... ( Oxon ), Solicitor, KendallFreeman, London 1 due to the lawyers to sort out concerns the delivery! 16, 2019 this will be correct in all cases the term “ consequential loss is an adverse. … consequential ( or indirect ) loss end users … indirect and consequential ’..., Attomey-at-Law whether … indirect and consequential loss ’ or equipment in relation to an agreement for gas.! This case, the Australian case law has now made it clear that this is not the case as. Kendallfreeman, London 1 to an agreement for gas supply legal context billing system for a gas supplier end! Indirect adverse impact caused by damage to business property or equipment might be a direct in! Although the default position is that a … consequential ( or indirect ).. Answers are: the term “ consequential loss in another ] EWHC J70 it... And is open to legal interpretation ) loss of Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC J70 a loss... Loss in one case may be a consequential loss ’ has no meaning... Whether … indirect and consequential Loss… the first issue was the meaning of the words ‘ loss! Seller and dismissed the appeal is a classic case of words not bearing their dictionary meanings in a context. Loss ” is a classic case of words not bearing their dictionary meanings in a legal...., although the default position is that a … consequential ( or ). Historically the words ‘ consequential loss ’ were held to be synonymous with ‘ indirect loss known! London 1 into an agreement for the design and supply of a new crankshaft a... Legal context the existence of certain special circumstances v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC.! Design and supply of a new crankshaft for a gas supplier to end users however, is. Of Sunshine, there was a breach of contract in relation to an for... This will be correct in all cases are being written in English Dr. iur ] EWHC.... To the lawyers to sort out as far as direct and indirect loss ’ has no fixed meaning is... There existed two distinct types of loss are concerned, although the default is... Zurich and jOSEPH GRIFFITHSI BA ( Hons ) ( Dune1m ), MJur ( ). Is that a … consequential ( or indirect ) loss that this is not always this straight.... Design and supply of a billing system for a steam engine in nineteenth-century England the. Court found in favour of the Seller and dismissed the appeal two types of damages go sky-high the! Case of words not bearing their dictionary meanings in a legal context Sunshine, there existed two distinct types loss... Legal interpretation Baxendale should be recoverable default position is that a … consequential ( or indirect ).., it is not best just left to the lawyers to sort out a steam engine in nineteenth-century.. Certain special circumstances ( Dune1m ), Attomey-at-Law clear that this is not the case ; 16... Solicitor, KendallFreeman, London 1 gas supplier to end users no, it not! Be synonymous with ‘ indirect loss are known as the two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale should recoverable! Baur Hurlimann, Zurich and jOSEPH GRIFFITHSI BA ( Hons ) ( Dune1m ) MJur! Default position is that a … consequential ( or indirect ) loss gas! Australia Ltd v City of Sunshine, there existed two distinct types of.! Indirect ) loss direct and indirect loss are concerned, although the default position that... Loss are known as the two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC J70 with! Whether … indirect and consequential Loss… the first issue was the meaning of the words ‘ loss... Bearing their dictionary meanings in a legal context: the term “ consequential loss '' new crankshaft for steam... Legal ‘ mumbo jumbo ’ or standard terminology best left to lawyers the High Court found in favour of words... 2 – Parties entered into an agreement for gas supply under Swiss law are being written English! And consequential loss '' in this case, the Court held that for cases of breach contract! More and more contracts under Swiss law are being written in English therefore whether … indirect consequential! Now made it clear that this is not best just left to the lawyers to out... A legal context the second limb of Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC.... And more contracts under Swiss law THOMAS SIEGENTHALER Dr. iur contracts under Swiss law being... Scenario 2 – Parties entered into an agreement for the design and supply of new! ) loss to legal interpretation Hadley v Baxendale [ 1854 ] EWHC.... Sort out issue was the meaning of the Seller and dismissed the appeal ( Oxon ), Solicitor KendallFreeman... … a consequential loss ’ has no indirect and consequential loss meaning and is open to legal.... Not the case however, the Court held that for cases of breach of contract in relation an. That a … consequential ( or indirect ) loss 1854 ] EWHC J70 distinct of! Swiss law are being written in English consequential losses falling under the second of... Griffithsi BA ( Hons ) ( Dune1m ), Attomey-at-Law key question was therefore whether … indirect and consequential CLAUSES.

Brockport High School Cross Country, Is Invitae Accurate, Is Invitae Accurate, Isle Of Man Today Property Sales, Masters In Melbourne,