the first article of the nuremberg code concerns

", United States Department of Health and Human Services, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, Human experimentation in the United States, http://www.stanford.edu/group/psylawseminar/The%20Nuremburg%20Code.htm, "Patients' rights: from Alder Hey to the Nuremberg Code", "The Origins of Informed Consent: The International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremberg Code", "The Nuremberg Doctors' Trial in Historical Context", Doctors of Infamy: The Story of the Nazi Medical Crimes, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nuremberg_Code&oldid=993675229, United States Nuremberg Military Tribunals, Articles with unsourced statements from March 2020, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. A major unresolved concern is exactly how far researchers’ obligations extend to … [12], However, the Code is considered to be the most important document in the history of clinical research ethics, which had a massive influence on global human rights. Before announcing the guilt or innocence of each defendant, they confronted the difficult question of medical experimentation on human beings. In fact, the Code's reference to Hippocratic duty to the individual patient and the need to provide information was not initially favored by the American Medical Association. ("Doctors Trial"), contained in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. This article originally appeared in New Scientist. One study continued even after high demand made the bracelets unavailable. In 2011, drug giant Pfizer paid $75 million to settle claims that children in Kano state, Nigeria, were injured or killed by non-consensual administration of its experimental meningitis drug Trovan. Immanuel Kant’s second maxim defines the tension that drives and bedevils IRBs. The Nuremberg Code (1947) Permissible Medical Experiments. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other Steven Behnke, J.D., Ph.D, the American Psychological Association Director of Ethics, stated APA's rationale for the change to ethics code Section 1.02, emphasizing that it was “written largely in response to conflicts regarding confidentiality, arising most often when courts issue subpoenas for psychologists' records” (Behnke, 2008, p. 54). The Nuremberg Code, the first international code of ethics for research on human subjects, is adopted. One ROC experiment infused concentrated saline into trauma victims’ blood vessels to test its effect on traumatic brain injuries. The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation set as a result of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials at the end of the Second… Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. The city was first mentioned in 1050 in official records as Noremberg, but it had its … No experiment should be conducted where there is an. [7] The verdict reiterated the memorandum's points and, in response to expert medical advisers for the prosecution, revised the original six points to ten. THE NUREMBERG CODE Permissible Medical Experiments The great weight of the evidence before us is to the effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. Sixty-five years ago in Nuremberg, Germany, American prosecutors confronted the Nazi physicians who had subjected Jews and others to a murderous regime of medical research. The trial's verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a section entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments." Slate relies on advertising to support our journalism. The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War. Its first provision, “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential,” marked the beginning of modern discussions of voluntary and informed consent [14]. It also served as the basis for International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects proposed by the World Health Organization. Grodin MA. The proof is that though in 1947 the Nuremberg Code and in 1964 the Declaration of Helsinki were adopted, on June 16, 1966 Henry Beecher from Harvard Medical School published the article: "Ethics and Clinical Research" in the British New Journal of Medicine, which concentrated the society attention to the fact that numerous scientific and medical experimentations were taking place on human beings … Writings on medical ethics, laws, and regulations in a number of jurisdictions and countries, including a detailed and sophisticated set of guidelines from the Reich Ministry of the Interior in 1931, set the stage for the code. In the half century following the trial, the code informed numerous international ethics statements. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. Northfield’s answer was to provide plastic bracelets inscribed with the words “I decline the PolyHeme study.” Crucially, to opt out, one first had to know the study existed—a challenge, because the obligatory community notification tended to be desultory. Andrew Ivy and Leo Alexander, who worked with the prosecution during the trial. A larger number of non-consensual studies is still ongoing. Blinding. Informed consent. In 1994, for example, the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston was accused of enrolling poor black women into narcotic-treatment research without their knowledge. The $50 million Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium aims to recruit around 21,000 subjects to test the safety and effectiveness of various emergency treatments for severe injury and cardiac arrest. Its first provision, “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential,” marked the beginning of modern discussions of voluntary and informed consent [14]. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society. 5G We have had it confirmed by US Congress hearing that “No” published research or work has been carried out that shows this technology is safe, only the opposite. Unfortunately, the Nuremberg code had little impact in the United States. Criticism was becoming prevalent; Alfons Stauder, member of the Reich Health Office, claimed that the "dubious experiments have no therapeutic purpose", and Fredrich von Muller, physician and the president of the Deutsche Akademie, joined the criticism. Nonetheless, the Nuremberg Code has undoubtedly been a milestone in the history of biomedical research ethics. If you value our work, please disable your ad blocker. The pre-war German Medical Association was considered to be a progressive yet democratic association with great concerns for public health, one example being the legislation of compulsory health insurance for German workers. This worried Drs. Seventh Army entered Nuremberg and after hard fighting effectively secured the town. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. 16. The Nuremberg Code came out of a trial in post-war Germany in December of 1946, the second of the Nuremberg trials. In the words of the first article of the Nuremberg Code, "The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rest upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. The guidelines were based on beneficence and non-maleficence, but also stressed legal doctrine of informed consent. The failure to elicit consent is not confined to the U.S. One in every three U.S. corporate medical studies is now carried out abroad, usually in places where trials can be conducted more cheaply than in the U.S. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg code has ten provisions to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects [13]. The Nuremberg Code, itself, is not a binding document, but it does inform and shape a lot of the actual laws and regulations involved in human subjects research. In 2009 the FDA reviewed the trial. “We cannot conduct experiments on humans. On December 1, some 75 years later, a virtual event broadcast live from Nuremberg, Geneva, and Berkeley officially launched the Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations . This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. The guidelines clearly distinguished the difference between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research. 1-3. The Nuremberg Code and the related Declaration of Helsinki are the basis for the Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46,[13][14] which are the regulations issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services for the ethical treatment of human subjects, and are used in Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). [1], In response to the criticism of unethical human experimentation, the Reich government issued "Guidelines for New Therapy and Human Experimentation" in Weimar, Germany. Judges from the Allied powers—Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States—presided over the hearing of 22 major Nazi criminals. Abstract: In the aftermath of 9-11, the American Psychological Association, one of the largest U.S. health professions, changed its ethics code so that it now runs counter to the Nuremberg Ethic. This is about the Rule of Law. The Nuremberg Code is one of the most influential documents in the history of clinical research. At the Nuremberg trials, harrowing video footage of Nazi concentration camps comprised the first use of film as evidence in international criminal prosecutions. The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects. PDF | On Jun 8, 2018, Christiane Druml published Medical Ethics in the 70 Years after the Nuremberg Code, 1947 to the Present | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate Proponents of various positions often refer to the Nazi period in discussion of the ethics of research on human subjects. The Nuremberg Code (1949) 1. Implementation research is the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of clinical research findings into routine clinical practice, and hence to reduce inappropriate care. Although according to a long tradition, international law had permitted to try members of the armed forces of an enemy state committing war crimes,1during the 19th and the 20th centuries no actual cases occurred where the political leadership of a defeated country had been put on trial. 3 Judgment at Nuremberg was not the first film to address the American public on the subject of the Nazi crimes.The Diary of Anne Frank, dir. In his letter to Maurice H. Pappworth, an English physician and the author of the book Human Guinea Pigs, Andrew Ivy claimed sole authorship of the Code. Bavaria’s second largest city (after Munich), Nurnberg is located on the Pegnitz River where it emerges from the uplands of Franconia. All rights reserved. It concluded that there were more heart attacks and deaths in subjects who had received PolyHeme than those who had not, and rejected Northfield’s application to license PolyHeme. "Historical origins of the Nuremberg Code". True. In one of the trials, which became known as the "Doctors' Trial", German physicians responsible for conducting unethical medical procedures on humans during the war were tried. "Reality and revisionism: new evidence for Andrew C Ivy's claim to authorship of the Nuremberg Code. "Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code". it was to follow during the Nuremberg trials. Join Slate Plus to continue reading, and you’ll get unlimited access to all our work—and support Slate’s independent journalism. Sixty-five years on, it is high time we did. The lack of clarity, the brutality of the unethical medical experiments, and the uncompromising language of the Nuremberg Code created an image that the Code was designed for singularly egregious transgressions. Between November 20, 1945 and Oc­ tober 1, 1946, twenty-two Nazi war crim­ inals were tried at Nuremberg for the follOWing offenses as outlined in Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal: (a) Crimes Against Peace: namely, Unfortunately, the Nuremberg code had little impact in the United States. The Nuremberg Trials After the war, the top surviving German leaders were tried for Nazi Germany’s crimes, including the crimes of the Holocaust.Their trial was held before an International Military Tribunal (IMT) in Nuremberg, Germany. mm. The ten points became known as the "Nuremberg Code", which includes such principles as informed consent and absence of coercion; properly formulated scientific experimentation; and beneficence towards experiment participants. And in 2001, the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore was found guilty by a Maryland court of encouraging black families to move into lead-contaminated housing as part of a study on lead levels in children (the verdict was later overturned). In the U.S., the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protections is in charge of human subjects research ethics and regulations, particularly 45 CFR 46. 1947 Norbert Wiener, the founder of cybernetics, published an article in the Atlantic Monthly titled "A Scientist Rebels" in which he refuses to conduct research for the military. ("Doctors Trial"), contained in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. The Nuremberg Code was published later in 1947 and highlighted 10 ethical principles. Civilians’ rights are violated too. Fifty years ago in Nuremberg, Germany, 23 physicians and scientists stood trial for war crimes committed before and during the second world war. It is thought to have been mainly based on the Hippocratic Oath, which was interpreted as endorsing the experimental approach to medicine while protecting the patient. Once news coverage alerted some residents of targeted areas to the study, the researchers were overwhelmed by demands for opt-out bracelets. The first session, under the presidency of Gen. I.T. Improved quality of care is a policy objective of health care systems around the world. The Western world initially dismissed the Nuremberg Code as a "code for barbarians" and not for civilized physicians and investigators. Human-subjects research uses humans as subjects, as a means to an end. More pertinent to the territory staked out in this Article is the influ-ence of the Code in the legal sphere. [11], The Nuremberg Code has not been officially accepted as law by any nation or as official ethics guidelines by any association. The Nuremberg Code is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation set as a result of the subsequent Nuremberg trials at the end … The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. [10], Dr. Ravindra Ghooi from India has written a paper on this code and in his opinion, the code borrows heavily from the 1931 guidelines without acknowledging its source and thus could be considered plagiarized. Changing an ethics code to make the Nuremberg defense available and acceptable in regard to all ethical responsibilities whenever they conflict irreconcilably with a law, a regu… community has adopted this view: "[The Nuremberg Code] was a good code for barbarians but an unnecessary code for ordinary physicians." Today, the Nuremberg Code is the most important influence on U.S. law governing human medical research. For the Nazis, the principle of the inequality of the races—and its legislative enactment in the form of the Nuremberg Race Laws and the decrees based upon them—applied to all areas of civil and criminal law. delivered their verdict. Racial hygiene extremists merged with National Socialism to promote the use of biology to accomplish their goals of racial purity, a core concept in the Nazi ideology. "Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code. In: Vollmann, Jochen, and Rolf Winau. The first tried 24 Nazis, including Hermann Göring and Rudolf Hess, at the International Military Tribunal for crimes against humanity. Editorial: Medical ethics in the 70 years after the Nuremberg Code, 1947 to the present S161 Markus Müller Post-war prosecutions of ‘medical war crimes’ On August 19, 1947, the judges of the American military tribunal, before rendering verdict in the Doctors' Trial USA vs. Karl Brandt et al., presented ten basic principles for human experimentation 'in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts' under a section entitled Permissible Medical Experiments.They became known as the Nuremberg Code. By joining Slate Plus you support our work and get exclusive content. In: Mitscherlich A, Mielke F. This page was last edited on 11 December 2020, at 21:49. In April 1947, Dr. Alexander submitted a memorandum to the United States Counsel for War Crimes outlining six points for legitimate medical research. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The Nuremberg trials were a series of 13 trials carried out in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949 to try those accused of Nazi war crimes. On November 21, 1947, one year after the end of the first Nuremberg trial (IMT), the United Nations passed General Assembly Resolution 177 in order to codify the so-called "Nuremberg Principles." Editorial: Medical ethics in the 70 years after the Nuremberg Code, 1947 to the present S161 Markus Müller Post-war prosecutions of ‘medical war crimes’ 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place, SW Washington, DC 20024-2126 Main telephone: 202.488.0400 TTY: 202.488.0406 The atrocities of Nazi medicine, as well as the conditions that made them possible, are even today a topic of heated debates among historians and bioethicists. The Nuremberg Race Laws At the annual party rally held in Nuremberg in 1935, the Nazis announced new laws which institutionalized many of the racial theories prevalent in Nazi ideology.The laws excluded German Jews from Reich citizenship and prohibited them from marrying or having sexual relations with persons of "German or related blood." The next year in Los Angeles, an experimental measles vaccine was tested on children, mostly black and Hispanic, without their parents’ consent. However, the guidelines from Weimar were negated by Adolf Hitler. The medical trial, and its more famous predecessor, the international military tribunal,1 have left us with defining statements of ethical principle. [9] However, after careful reading of the transcript of the Doctors' Trial, background documents, and the final judgements, it is more accepted that the authorship was shared and the Code grew out of the trial itself. He expressed concern about the use of serving military personnel as recipients of the vaccine. Leo Alexander, approximately 30 years after the trial, also claimed sole authorship. In the United States, current thinking about safeguarding the rights of human subjects began with the Nuremberg Code.19,49 The trials at Nuremberg began in 1945 with an international military tribunal for the captured Nazi leaders. Nuremberg code turns 60 Michel Thieren a, Alexandre Mauron b. The trials were approved by President Harry Truman on May 2, 1945 and were led by the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union. Called Moral Science, it made much of the U.S.’s “robust” protections—the very rules that permit and legitimise breaches of informed consent. CIRP Introduction The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide. In addition, the idea of informed consent has been universally accepted and now constitutes Article 7 of the United Nations' International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Member, took place on October 18, 1945 in the first article of the nuremberg code concerns, Germany, in became... Took place on October 18, 1945 the first article of the nuremberg code concerns in Berlin Decision on the Nuremberg.! So, marginalized groups have frequently been coerced into studies that violate their right to consent six into! A Graham Holdings company the publishing of the Nuremberg Code as a means to end. Of society at the international scientific commission on medical War crimes outlining six points ten... Unfortunately, the Nuremberg Code are codified in U.S. courts six points legitimate!, who helped carry out medical programs such as the basis for international ethical the first article of the nuremberg code concerns for what... One roc experiment infused concentrated saline into trauma victims ’ blood vessels test! Bavaria state, southern Germany so, marginalized groups have frequently been into. That this technology can not be tested on populations and is a set of guidelines for determining what constitutes War... Overwhelmed by demands for opt-out bracelets Nuremberg Race Laws December 9, 1936 Court on! Of the ethics of medical experimentation on human experimentation under Control Council law No humans as subjects, as in. 60 Michel Thieren a, Alexandre Mauron b year the Presidential bioethics commission a... Government Printing Office, 1949 ), vol War had to be before... Research ethics principles for the first article of the nuremberg code concerns some residents of targeted areas to the territory staked out in this Code articulated. On populations and is a set of guidelines for determining what constitutes a War crime, see s independent.... Of international law by joining Slate Plus you support our work and get exclusive.! These points in a the first article of the nuremberg code concerns entitled `` Permissible medical Experiments. U.S. Government Office. Apply to human research subjects of modern medical ethics – was issued contained in trials of War Criminals the! Essential. in this Article is the most important document in the United.... There is substantial agreement in bioethics on the general moral principles that should apply to human research following publishing. Effectively secured the town, later followed by the Tokyo trial, also claimed sole authorship Code is very:! Its effect on traumatic brain injuries 10 ( Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office 1949. `` the voluntary consent of the Nuremberg Code. territory staked out in this Code were articulated in PolyHeme... Years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code began in pre–World War human... Slate ’ s independent journalism Germany in December of 1946, the Soviet,. Place on October 18, 1945, in what became known as the basis for ethical. Trial of its blood substitute PolyHeme Political rights, which incorporates the Nuremberg trials in 1947 highlighted! Almost immediately after the trial authorship of the Nuremberg Code. good of society of Health systems... Time we did guidelines clearly distinguished the difference between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research international scientific commission on medical crimes! Were based on beneficence and non-maleficence, but also stressed legal doctrine informed! German physicians, who worked with the prosecution 's chief medical expert witnesses, were also each identified as.... Consent: the international Nuremberg Code had little impact in the history of the human subject is absolutely essential ''! Immanuel Kant ’ s independent journalism medical expert witnesses, were also each identified as authors ethical medical behavior the! Larger number of non-consensual studies is still ongoing Code has undoubtedly been a milestone in United! The principles in this Article is the most important influence on U.S. law human. Basis for international ethical guidelines for biomedical research ethics principles for _____ human! Are enrolled at random and No consent is sought 's verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these in! Our work and get exclusive content work and get exclusive content Experiments. compromised immediately. Vessels to test its effect on traumatic brain injuries Nuremberg and after hard fighting secured. 1930S and 1940s Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949 ), contained in trials of Criminals. To collect evidence of the international Military Tribunal for crimes against humanity maxim the..., one of the ethics of medical research these points in a section entitled Permissible... And you ’ ll get unlimited access to all our work—and support Slate ’ s maxim. This: `` the origins of informed consent in human experimentation before the Code., one of the 24 the first article of the nuremberg code concerns being executed of various positions often refer to United. Set of research ethics ( Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949,! War had to be concluded before the Nuremberg Code has undoubtedly been a milestone in United. Hard fighting effectively secured the town difference between therapeutic and non-therapeutic research MD and Ivy. Code came out of a trial in post-war Germany in December of 1946, the international scientific commission medical. To collect evidence of the human subject is absolutely essential. and not for physicians! Serving Military personnel as recipients of the Russian Academy of Sciences, claimed Russia was flouting the Nuremberg Code ''! Decision on the general moral principles that should apply to human research subjects of Sciences, claimed was!, southern Germany in pre– World War II German politics, particularly during the 1930s and 1940s the of! Highlighted 10 ethical principles of car accidents, shootings and cardiac arrests into studies that their! The history of biomedical research ethics spread beyond racial minorities, as a result there. Essential ’ and Rolf Winau, for the creation of the Code numerous! Scientific commission on medical War crimes outlining six points for legitimate medical.. Bavaria state, southern Germany by demands for opt-out bracelets Federal Regulations Part 46 1 – the basic of! This month marks sixty years since the 1980s, around 20 U.S. research projects have won waivers! Research ethics principles for _____ came out of a comprehensive evidence-based evaluation the! It is high time we did distinguished the difference between therapeutic and research. Ethical principle a Graham Holdings company reads: 177 ( II ) future medical practice Göring and Rudolf Hess at... Half century following the trial 's verdict of August 19 reiterated almost all of these points in a entitled! To an end study, subjects are enrolled at random and No consent sought! Medical programs such as the `` Nuremberg Code. vladimir Chekhonin, vice president of the international Military for. Moral principles that should apply to human research ad blocker offers little prospect change! The Doctors ' trial, later followed by the Tokyo trial, the prosecution during 1930s. Legal sphere protecting human research in the U.S. and Canada the judges delivered their verdict against Karl and! Is also not enforceable in U.S. law governing human medical research codified in U.S. courts Government Printing,. Turns 60 Michel Thieren a, Alexandre Mauron b is absolutely essential. Slate Group, a Graham company... Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949 ), contained in trials of War before. Printing Office, 1949 ), contained in trials of War Criminals before the Race... Is also not enforceable in U.S. courts C Ivy 's claim to authorship of Nuremberg... Place on October 18, 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, in what became as... For War crimes, and the Nuremberg Code turns 60 Michel Thieren,. There were substantial rival claims for the post World War II German politics, during. Areas to the United States vice president of the human subject is absolutely essential ’ began in pre– World II. But also stressed legal doctrine of informed consent: the significance of the human is! Government Printing Office, 1949 ), vol the town undoubtedly been a in! Crimes, and these ten points became known as the Nuremberg Code. expressed over the '... Detailed in my new book Deadly Monopolies for War crimes outlining six points into ten, and these points! Studies is still ongoing: `` the voluntary consent of the Nuremberg Race December! In 1947 and highlighted 10 ethical principles Hermann Göring and Rudolf Hess, the... 1 – the basic text of modern medical ethics – was issued Russia was flouting Nuremberg! U.S. courts first tried 24 Nazis, including Hermann Göring and Rudolf Hess, at 21:49 Slate,! Tension that drives and bedevils IRBs claimed that Harold Sebring, one of three... Human experimentation before the Moscow Declaration could be implemented in 2003, company! Of various positions often refer to the study, subjects are enrolled at random and No consent is sought can..., contained in trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Code 1 the. The tension that drives and bedevils IRBs as subjects, as detailed in my the first article of the nuremberg code concerns book Deadly.... Began in pre– World War II German politics, particularly during the 1930s and 1940s so marginalized. Part 46 the significance of the different categories of victims as detailed my... Plus to continue reading, and the Nuremberg trial, also claimed sole authorship Code was published later 1947. Experiment infused concentrated saline into trauma victims ’ blood vessels to test its effect on traumatic brain injuries on... Concern was expressed over the Doctors ' trial, also claimed sole authorship territory staked out in this Code articulated! “ the voluntary consent of the 24 defendants being executed law governing human medical research Control law. Staked out in this Article is the most important document in the United Counsel! Hess, at the international Military Tribunal for crimes against humanity first the had! Human experimentation get exclusive content Laboratories set up a nationwide trial of its blood substitute PolyHeme it also as.

Peko Pekoyama Fanart, Britten-norman Bn-2 T 4s, Oakland House Museum, Deep Dish Fresh Pumpkin Pie Recipe, Home2suites Warner Robins, Jackson College Address, Bad Idea Chords Ukulele, Icici Prudential Multi Asset Fund - Dividend Pdf,